While the methods behind collecting bite mark evidence at the scene are leading toward greater standardization, the methodology behind analyzing bite marks is. Bitemark analysis is used widely in the judicial system to establish a connection between the suspect and a crime. Others say that its acceptable to state there is a probability that a suspect created the mark, but that. A novel computerassisted method of bite mark analysis for. He rose to prominence in the 1980s as a selfproclaimed forensic dentistry expert, despite having no formal training in forensic science, based on bite mark analysis techniques he claimed to have invented and which could not be conducted by anyone else. Our study aimed to help close these gaps for a number of forensic featurecomparison. As for the fields methods of collecting and recording bite marks, its true. Bite mark evidence used to convict pennsylvania man of.
The methods of wax impression were better for producing. Issues in human and animal bite mark bitemark analysis. Rakhee modak 1, sandhya tamgadge 2, amit mhapuskar 1, manjula hebbale 1, n vasantha vijayarabhavan 1 1 department of oral medicine and radiology, bharati vidyapeeth deemed university dental college and hospital, pune, india 2 department of oral and maxillofacial pathology and microbiology, d. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances.
Incredibly, prosecutors are still defending bite mark. The methods of wax impression were better for producing overlay of tooth away from the occlusal plane. Analysis and identification of bite marks in forensic casework. Animal teeth are very different from humans teeth, so they leave very different bitemark patterns. Rakhee modak 1, sandhya tamgadge 2, amit mhapuskar 1, manjula hebbale 1, n vasantha vijayarabhavan 1 1 department of oral medicine and radiology, bharati. I have written master thesis about different methods in bitemark analysis. Since 2014, the marshall project has been curating some of the best criminal justice reporting from around the. Literature reveals various methods for bite mark analysis such as manual, radiographic, and computedassisted by different authors. A comparative study of trends in human bite mark analysis. Sep 07, 2016 bitemark analysis is conducted by forensic dentists and relies on two foundational premises. Upper jaw distance cuspid to cuspid cuspid to cuspid 38mm 42mm bite mark.
The two applied techniques are similar in accuracy for bite mark analysis. Which is odd, because there is exactly zero proof that bitemarks. Morris was a neighbor to the little girl who was found stabbed, sexually. Bitemark evidence a curated collection of links the record what are records. In the past, the direct method compared a model of the suspects teeth to a lifesize photograph of the actual bite mark. A novel computerassisted method of bite mark analysis for gender. Who is michael west, bite marks expert on the innocence. Bitemark analysis is extremely complex, with many factors involved in a forensic dentists ability to determine the identity of the perpetrator.
Although bite marks of an individual do have uniqueness due to specific characteristics and. For heinous crimes homicide, sexual assault, child abuse bitemark analysis has been a standby for forensic detectives. A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite. A bite mark is a mark created by teeth either alone or in the combination with other oral structures 2,3. Comparative study on two methods for bite mark analysis. Bite mark analysis includes description of bite marks, bite mark recognition, bite mark registration, evidence collection on suspects, scanning bite mark photographs, detecting and. Golden forensic odontology is the branch of dentistry that deals with the collection, evaluation, and proper handling of dental evidence to assist law.
For lots more information about forensic dentistry and crime stuff, check out the articles and links below. Bite site evidence general considerations the forensic odontologist is often not involved in the initial examination and collection of the bitemark evidence. Bite mark analysis is an imperative area of forensic odontology and considered the commonest form of dental evidence presented in. Others say that its acceptable to state there is a probability that a suspect created the mark, but that its important to clarify that bite marks cant be the only thing linking the suspect to the crime. Having importance in biometrics as well as in forensics the precise matching of.
Irrespective of the method used, bitemark analysis include registration. The principle of bite mark analysis is based on the premise that no two people have similar teeth, and hence the bite marks made are also dissimilar. Intercanine distance and bite marks analysis using metric method. Anthony cardoza, who coauthored a 1999 study showing that bite mark analysis could be reliable under specific conditions, admitted, the best bite mark is one you can swab for dna source. Kouble and craig compared direct methods and indirect methods of bite mark analysis.
In 1991, john kunco was convicted in pennsylvania of raping and torturing a 55yearold woman who lived at the apartment building where hed previously been a maintenance worker. Forensic dentist training as well as proper education of the jury are also factors. Report to the president forensic science in criminal. Our study aimed to help close these gaps for a number of forensic featurecomparison methodsspecifically, methods for comparing dna samples, bitemarks, latent fingerprints, firearm marks, footwear, and hair. Distance tooth 6 to tooth 10 tooth 6 to tooth 10 44. Now some critics feel that bite mark analysis should be used only to eliminate, not to identify, a suspect. Bitemark analysis is conducted by forensic dentists and relies on two foundational premises. Bitemark analysis is junk, white house says inverse.
Bitemark analysis have a significant role in forensic dentistry. The marks left by the teeth in a person may be used to identify an individual. Bite mark analysis and comparison using imageperception technology j forensic odontostomatol 2006. These are very different procedures, and the failure to distinguish. The movement of a persons jaw and tongue when he or she bites contributes to the type of mark that is left. Bite mark management and analysis master of forensic odontology. Who is michael west, bite marks expert on the innocence files. An initial analysis of the bite mark found a match between youngs teeth and the bite mark, but a more recent analysis, commissioned by the defense, contradicted this finding. Bite mark evidence, an aspect of forensic odontology, is the. Impressions of both, maxillary as well as mandibular.
Apr 17, 2012 similar to fingerprint analysis, the assumption behind bite mark comparisons that every persons dental characteristics are unique has not been adequately scientifically studied or scrutinized. The differences in size and shape of teeth can sometimes be easily noticed especially when teeth are missing or prominent 29. Historically, the manual method was the only method. Methods to document human bitemark evidence bitemark, bite mark, bite mark the meaning of the terms is clear and there is no need for the abfo to endorse a particular form. Alreshaid, rameswari poornima j riyadh elm university, college of d received 31 january 2019. Human bite mark analysis is by far the most demanding and complicated part of forensic dentistry. Examine the pattern to determine if it is a bitemark. Feb, 2015 bite mark analysis is most commonly used in criminal rape, murder and child abuse cases. How the flawed science of bite mark analysis has sent. Bite mark analysis is extremely complex, with many factors involved in a forensic dentists ability to determine the identity of the perpetrator. Abfo bitemark methodology standards and guid elin s standards.
Table 1 shows statistics of different grades of identification by four different methods of comparison in maxillary bite mark impressions and mandibular bite mark impressions. Bite marks can be found in food, flesh, cigars, pipes and musical instruments. Aug 19, 2016 bite mark analysis includes description of bite marks, bite mark recognition, bite mark registration, evidence collection on suspects, scanning bite mark photographs, detecting and correcting photographic distortion, resizing the photograph, printing and enhancing and adding text, scanning suspects casts, overlay fabrication, comparison methods, guidelines on bite mark analysis and management. Bite marks analysis is based on the principle that no two mouths are alike. The aims of this study are to evaluate the accuracy of two methods for bite mark analysis overlay and docking techniques on three different food materials. However the advent of dna and its recovery from bite marks has offered an objective method of bite mark analysis. Bite mark evidence used to convict pennsylvania man of rape. According to pretty and turnbull, the central dogma of bite mark analysis is based on two assumptions. Bite mark management and analysis master of forensic.
The results of the current study anticipate to serve in investigations of the bite mark evidence. Although bite marks of an individual do have uniqueness due to specific characteristics and arrangement of the teeth, when it comes to bite mark analysis, it is. Skepticism around bite mark analysis has mounted in recent years in part because of the growing number of wrongful convictions attributable to bite mark evidence. Using scientific methodology, the examination of bitemark evidence can be divided into four basic steps. Methods to document human bitemark evidence bitemark, bite mark, bitemark the meaning of the terms is clear and there is no need for the abfo to endorse a particular form. In fact, the entire section on bite mark analysis is an extended argument explaining why it isnt recommended. Patil university, school of dentistry, navi mumbai. The national academy of sciences slams bite mark analysis. Pdf comparative study on two methods for bite mark analysis.
The uniqueness of the human dentition has not been scientifically established. The first step in analyzing the bite is to identify it as human. This is for a high school level forensic science class. In concluding that more research is needed to confirm the fundamental basis for the science of bite mark comparison, the nas report summarized some of the basic problems inherent in bite mark analysis and interpretation as follows. Bitemark analysis and comparison forensic odontology part ii. Council concludes bitemark analysis is junk the intercept. A human bite mark is usually described as an elliptical. Some of these methods include bite mark analysis, labeling of dental prosthesis dentures, rugoscopy palatal rugae which are located on the roof of the mouth, and cheiloscopy lip prints 1. Published on mar 6, 2017 this project has been created with explain everything interactive whiteboard for windows.
Historically, the manual method was the only method known for generating overlays and was used first in about 1966. Bite mark analysis is an imperative area of forensic odontology and considered the commonest form of dental evidence presented in the criminal court. Bitemark analysis howstuffworks science howstuffworks. Poster presentation a comparative s analysis methods reem m. Abfo bitemark methodology standards and guid elin s. Feb 28, 2009 as with other experiencebased forensic methods, forensic odontology suffers from the potential for large bias among bite mark experts in evaluating a specific bite mark in cases in. The position of the body at the time the bite was inflicted may also play a part. The odontologist who aided in youngs conviction later said that the prosecution pushed him to exaggerate his results. Bite mark evidence has been introduced in trials all over the country, and sometimes has been the smoking gun leading to a conviction.
Bite mark evidence, an aspect of forensic odontology, is the process by which odontologists dentists attempt to match marks found at crime scenes with the dental impressions of suspects. West practices general dentistry in hattiesburg, miss. Similar to fingerprint analysis, the assumption behind bite mark comparisons that every persons dental characteristics are unique has not been adequately scientifically studied or scrutinized. Xerographic method was the most accurate of the four techniques, with the highest reproducibility for bite mark analysis. As with other experiencebased forensic methods, forensic odontology suffers from the potential for large bias among bite mark experts in evaluating a specific bite mark in cases in. In these experiments, direct comparisons were made between dental models and either photographs or fingerprint powder liftmodels. Various techniques are used in bite mark analysis and the choice of technique depends largely on personal preference. Aug 21, 2012 bite mark analysis and comparison using imageperception technology j forensic odontostomatol 2006. The study aimed to determine the technique with maximum accuracy in production of bite mark overlay. Following is a discussion of the difference between bite mark analysis and comparison of a bite mark to a suspects dentition for purposes of identification. I was interested to know about the role of dental professionals in forensic team and how dental findings can serve the justice system. Now some critics feel that bitemark analysis should be used only to eliminate, not to identify, a suspect.
Some of these methods include bite mark analysis, labeling of dental prosthesis dentures, rugoscopy palatal rugae which are located on. Jan 30, 2017 in fact, the entire section on bite mark analysis is an extended argument explaining why it isnt recommended. Analytical methods are so widespread in science that the term analysis often serves as a synonym for research in general, both in the natural and social sciencesfor example, quantitative and qualitative. Bite mark analysis is most commonly used in criminal rape, murder and child abuse cases. Reliability of intercanine distance while analysing bite mark using metric method. Bite marks are thus, considered as valuable alternative to fingerprinting and dna identification in forensic examinations. Since 2014, the marshall project has been curating some of the best criminal justice reporting from around the web.
The results of this study showed that the computerbased method for bite mark analysis was as accurate as the docking procedure in cases with bite marks in an apple and may be useful in a variety. Identification and matching of human bite marks and injuries can give a forensic scientist great value of results. Having importance in biometrics as well as in forensics the precise matching of patterns in a bite marks is a critical area of research are one of the most frequent form of human abuse and hence their analysis is the most demanding and complicated part of forensic. Giannelli in criminal trials, forensic dentistry typically is used in two ways. He rose to prominence in the 1980s as a selfproclaimed forensic dentistry expert, despite having no formal. The issues within the bite mark analysis are discussed in this paper. Irrespective of the method used, bitemark analysis include registration of both the bitemark and the suspect dentition, comparison of the dentition and the bitemark, inspection of similarities and dissimilarities. Bite mark analysis article about bite mark analysis by. Golden forensic odontology is the branch of dentistry that deals with the collection, evaluation, and proper handling of dental evidence to assist law enforcement as well as civil and criminal judicial proceedings. The movement of a persons jaw and tongue when he or she. In these records you will find the most recent and the most authoritative articles on the topics, people and events that are shaping the criminal justice conversation. Cases where dna revealed that bite mark analysis led to.
244 184 126 618 413 423 224 1530 1467 180 1477 904 210 961 1393 1239 1259 624 922 571 957 1 49 126 575 1278 1059 1560 993 1200 1048 940 1445 306 188 1420 554 1338 1209 664 1173